Book your FREE consultation today! Click Here or call: (613) 730-0264
Will Candy With 30% Less Sugar Just Make Matters Worse?
Once reformulated this candy will "only" be 36.5% free sugar by weight 
A few weeks ago I blogged about the new lower in sugar Kit Kat bar that contains 4 fewer calories than the old bar (with 0.7g less sugar). The front of its package doesn't shout out about lower sugars though, instead it hypes "extra milk and cocoa".

It was the first example I'd seen of the inevitable future of ultra-processed treats that are being designed and launched under the banner of sugar as our global, singular, dietary boogeyman.

While there's little doubt we over consume sugar, and that sugar is one of the primary drivers of hyper-palatability and obesity, if the marketplace sees an influx of "now with 30% less sugar" ultra-processed foods, I'm not sure they won't make matters worse.

And that's precisely the sort of thing we're going to see as evidenced by this new line of Nestlé candy which according to this news story, will be sold alongside the original candy "with a 30% less sugar banner on the packaging"

Sounds an awful lot like the early 1990s when we saw the launch of "Fat-Free" Snackwell cookies (and more of course).

Will the "Now With 30% Less Sugar" banner lead people to buy candy more often? To eat candy more frequently? To eat more candy at each sitting? To grudgingly give in to their naggy kids and pack it in their lunches because it's less bad? Or will it lead to an overall reduction in free sugars and calories consumed?

For the majority of folks, my money's on all of the former, and none of the latter.
Saturday Stories: Car Currency, SuperBabies, and a Supplement Scheme
Debbie Weingarten in Longreads explains the relationship between the currency of cars and how to leave a husband.

Heather Kirk Lanier in Vela on how superbabies don't cry.

Charles Rusnell and Jennie Russell in CBC News highlight a government funded Vitamin D supplement scheme.
Buddy Mercury Sings His Ode To Post November 8th, 2016 America
And I have to say, I'm right there with today's Funny Friday's Buddy.

Have a great weekend

For Beginners, Maybe Cooking Shouldn't Be "Healthy"
Serious Eats' 3 Ingredient Stovetop Mac & Cheese
Having worked with literally thousands of patients on improving the quality of their diets I can tell you that the most common barrier I hear to their adoption of more regular home cooked meals is a real or perceived lack of skill or talent at it.

Sometimes their beliefs stem from personal experiences and experiments. Other times they come from one or more family members who have complained about a particular dish (rather than be thankful that someone took the time to cook for them).

I can also tell you that many of the folks who don't cook regularly believe that if they were to start doing so, they'd need to be cooking "healthy" foods.

Why sure, cooking especially healthy meals is a nice aspiration, but if you're a beginner in the kitchen, why not instead focus on cooking meals that while perhaps not incredibly healthy, are meals that you're confident that you or your family will enjoy?

The goal really is to gain comfort in the kitchen and/or to gain the trust of your family members that you can cook yummy things.

So if you're a beginner in the kitchen, maybe cutting your cooking teeth on less healthy meals will encourage you to gain the skills and comfort you'll need to slowly improve your repertoire, and in so doing make the kitchen a room in which you actually enjoy spending time.
        
Hey MDs, Scales Measure Gravity, Not Health, And Not Lifestyle
Today's guest post comes from long-time reader Sarah Trend who shared with me the handout she received on leaving her most recent endocrinology appointment. She also provided me with her thoughts and kindly agreed to let me share them with you. All this to say, if you're an MD the only thing your patient's weight tells you is the gravitational pull of the earth on them at a given moment in time. It tells you nothing about the presence or absence of health, nor does it tell you anything about their lifestyles. And if you're planning on providing lifestyle related advice, best you explore your patients' actual lifestyles first - regardless of their weights. Plenty of people with higher weights have incredibly healthful lifestyles, and many people with lower weights live awfully unhealthy lives.
I went to the endocrinologist this morning. The PA had me step on the scale and she recorded my weight. There was no discussion whatsoever with her or with the doctor about my weight. Imagine my surprise when I reviewed the "follow up" instructions - photo attached.

For the record, I weigh about 5 lb more than their "long term goal weight". I am 5'8". Had there been any discussion whatsoever, the doctor would have learned that the "weight loss tips" are not of much value to me: I only drink water. I do not eat fast food. I eat breakfast (hard-boiled egg and some fruit) every morning. I watch, at most, one 30-minute TV show a day. My husband does all grocery shopping. We cook >95% of our meals at home (from scratch, not boxes) and I take leftovers for lunch every day. Many of these meals are vegetarian. I get 4-5 hours of vigorous exercise every week - in fact, before my appointment I ran 3.25 miles at a pace of 9:22/mile. I only take the stairs at work. I get >10K steps each day.

Also, my blood pressure, as taken by his PA in the appointment, is 91/56.

So yes, I would really like to lose 10-15 vanity pounds, but that is all they are - vanity pounds. And yes, my weight is a few pounds above a BMI of 25. Had he had a conversation with me, he would have learned that I worked 61 straight 12-16 hour days at the start of this year. Some days, yeah, I grabbed a bag of peanut M&Ms or skittles from the snack cupboard in the office. Because I'm a human. And also - my period is due, so I'm up about 3 pounds of water weight from that.

I am so angry. Is this what passes for medical advice now? Meaningless random comments about weight loss with no conversation about health? I am appalled that an endocrinologist (who presumably sees patients with a variety of weight issues) thinks this is appropriate. Thought you might like to see it.
Saturday Stories: Horseshoe Crabs, Math Proofs, and Fentanyl Addiction
By Asturnut (talk) - I (Asturnut (talk)) created this work entirely by myself., CC BY-SA 3.0, Link
Caren Chesler in Popular Mechanics on the irreplacable medical marvel that is horseshoe crab blood.

Natalie Wolchover in Wired on the retired German statistician who solved one of mathematics most elusive proofs.

Darryl Green (as told to Katherine Laidlaw) in Toronto Life details his journey from successful ER physician to a fentanyl addiction.
Life Is A Real-Life Episode of Veep
I can't imagine you didn't catch Sean Spicer's recent press conference. If it weren't so horrifying, it'd fit perfectly in HBO's apparently prescient presidential comedy Veep as is evidenced by today's Funny Friday.

Have a great weekend!

No, Grade 1 Teachers Shouldn't Use Fun Dip To Teach Adjectives
And here I thought I could no longer be shocked by the gratuitous use of junk food to reward, entertain, or pacify kids.

Silly me.

Thanks to a friend who'd rather remain anonymous, I learned that her son's Grade 1 class was given Fun Dip to eat and write about in an exercise on adjectives.

Little did they realize they were also being taught about marketing, and about how giving kids junk food has become so normalized, that their teacher didn't see anything wrong with this lesson.

That the use of candy as a teaching tool didn't give this particular Grade 1 teacher enough pause to not follow through speaks not to her skills as a teacher, but rather to just how pervasive this sort of practice has become. People don't question normal behaviour, but just because something's been normalized, does not make it wise.