|The Nannies In Philadelphia Will No Longer Sell You 2L Bottles of Soda|
And yet there's no outcry from the beverage industry.
You'd think there would be. After all, back when nanny Bloomberg tried to pass his cup size ban - the one that would have forced you to buy two 500ml cups if you wanted to drink the volume of a human stomach (1L) worth of soda at once, the beverage industry bought a full page advertisement in the New York Times to complain about it (that's it up above).
But what about Philadelphians' rights to buy as many giant bottles of Pepsi as they want? Why no screaming about Philadelphia's fun and freedom stealing nanny?
Because Philadelphia's nanny is the beverage industry. You see the beverage industry, consequent to Philadelphia's new soda tax, wants to ensure people keep buying plenty of product, and to help ease the tax' sting, they're going to stop selling 2L bottles (which incur more tax) altogether.
So the next time you're tempted to shout about the nanny state when someone like Bloomberg proposes a new policy designed to encourage decreased consumption of junk food, remember, you already live in a nanny state, and the food industry is your nanny.
|Saturday Stories: Opioids, Integrative Dietetics, and DNA Horoscopes|
how doctors got him hooked on opioids, and then didn't help him come off them.
Kevin Klatt in Science Based Medicine bemoans his dietetic profession's new found embrace of integrative and functional medicine.
Sarah Zhang in The Atlantic on how commercial DNA testing is akin to a modern day horoscope.
|Rare Footage of the GOP's AHCA Planning and Prep|
And yes, today is Funny Friday.
Have a great weekend!
|Junior Kindergarteners and The Unnecessary Crutch of Junk Food |
It's part of a school newsletter for her kid's Junior Kindergarten class. Here's what caught her (and my) eye. On Wednesday's the school has a "WOW" day - where the students are encouraged to walk to school.
Also, kids who rode the bus to school received a free hot chocolate, because though not walkers, their use of public transport reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Oh, and to raise money for the Canadian Wildlife Federation, the children were able to purchase hot chocolate. In all they raised $166.
In looking for a photo for this post, I came across another school's page discussing how, "Math plus Zippers equals Hot Chocolate Party!" whereby the kids in the class ate cookies and then learned how to graph by plotting how delicious they were, and then completed a second graph of whether or not they enjoyed marshmallows in their hot chocolate. Later that same week, to celebrate the fact that every kid learned how to do up their own jacket's zipper they were rewarded with a "Zipper Party" to celebrate the achievement with cookies and hot chocolate.
To be very clear, these schools aren't examples of schools that don't care about their kids, they're just examples of how normalized the use of junk food has become in rewarding and entertaining our children. Bet all of these kids would have had just as much, or more enjoyment, with an extra gym class, extended recess, a dress up day, a dance party, helping with the school's morning announcements, etc.
Just because junk food works, doesn't mean we need to use it.
|California Public Libraries Giving In-N-Out Burgers to 4 Year Olds |
McDonald's, Pizza Hut, Burger King, and Arby's. Today's example comes from California Public Libraries and their promotion of In-N-Out's "Cover to Cover Club"
Here are the program's details as described by the Saratoga Springs Public Library
An In-N-Out hamburger or cheeseburger (limit 3 per child apparently)
And if city run public institutions wanted to provide some incentive for young kids to read and use libraries, how difficult would it be for them to partner with city run community centres to hand out coupons for free admissions to local public pools or with the Parks Service to hand out free day use fee coupons for a nearby State park?
|Saturday Stories: Feminism, Old Queens, and Lactic Acid|
explains why yes she (and anyone) can be a feminist and simultaneously believe that the Jewish people have a right to their own nation..
Sam Knight, in The Guardian, with a fascinating and incredible long read on the inevitable death of the Queen.
Michael Joyner, in Sports Illustrated, on the myths and truths about lactic acid.
[And if you don't follow me on Twitter or Facebook, here's a recent Q&A I did with Lisa Borden from Borden Communications covering diets, sugar, public policy, my favourite breakfast, most desired lunch date, and more]
|Just a Spectacular Supermarket Commercial Championing Produce Over Products|
Thanks to one of my Facebook readers for sharing this incredible supermarket video that's serving as today's Funny Friday.
Have a great weekend!
|A New Heart and Stroke Funded Report Calls For a "Sugary Drink" Tax|
According to the report, Canadians purchased an average of 444ml of sugary drinks per day. And that's a per capita average which includes people like the 5 members of my family who purchase an average of none a day - so clearly those who are drinking sugary drinks, are actually averaging more than that. Dishearteningly, things are even worse for youth with the report finding them buying 578ml per day for Canadians between 9-18 years old.
That's a huge amount, and while some might be confused given the regular coverage of decreasing soda and juice consumption, the report explains,
"Over the past 12 years (2004 to 2015), the per capita sales volume has decreased for regular soft drinks (-27%), fruit drinks (-22%), and 100% juice (-10%). In contrast, per capita sales volume increased for energy drinks (+638%), sweetened coffee (+579%), flavoured water (+527%), drinkable yogurt (+283%), sweetened tea (+36%), flavoured milk (+21%), and sports drinks (+4%). In 2004, sales of flavoured water, flavoured milk, drinkable yogurt, and energy drinks were negligible. However, by 2015, these categories accounted for approximately 18% of all sugary drink sales, and compensated for the 7% proportional reduction in sales of regular soft drinks since 2004."
Breaking it down into dollars and cents, the report estimates that sugary drink consumption will lead to over $50 billion in direct health care costs over the next 25 years coming from the costs associated with their projections of 25 years of unchecked sugary drink consumption contributing to
"900,000 new cases of type 2 diabetes, 300,000 new cases of ischemic heart disease, 100,000 new cases of cancer, and 40,000 strokes. Canadians’ sugary drink consumption is estimated to account for 63,000 deaths and almost 2.2 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs), which represent premature death or poor health."In turn, according to their modelling, a 20% sugary drink tax would generate $43.6 billion in tax revenue as well as $11.5 billion in direct health care savings from averting many of the cases, conditions and DALYs noted above.
[If you're curious about the report's methodologies and assumptions, please head over to the HSF's media centre where they're hosting the full report.]